What should be included in a recommendation for evaluating and remediating suspicious authentication activity alerts?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Master the Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect Expert exam with our comprehensive SC-100 quiz. Learn with detailed questions, explanations, and get exam-ready with expert insights!

When developing a recommendation for evaluating and remediating suspicious authentication activity alerts, it is vital to leverage tools that can automate responses and processes. Azure Functions, as a serverless compute service, allows developers to run code in response to events, making it an effective choice for handling authentication alerts. By using Azure Functions, organizations can automatically process alerts, trigger other workflows, and implement remediation actions without needing extensive infrastructure management.

This capability supports rapid response requirements for suspicious authentication activities, allowing for timely remediation and thereby enhancing the overall security posture. The serverless nature of Azure Functions means it can scale automatically based on the volume of alerts, ensuring that the organization can respond to threats without being overwhelmed by the infrastructure complexities.

Although other options, like Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), play an essential role in monitoring and logging authentication activity, they primarily serve as a centralized place for analysis rather than directly intervening in remediation. Thus, while a comprehensive security strategy would include various elements, Azure Functions specifically stands out in this context for its proactive automation capabilities in response to alerts.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy